Thursday, May 21, 2009
























"I have nothing to hide. I am who I am. And this is about singing … nothing else." - Adam Lambert on his sexuality

"It feels good, man, but Adam deserves this..." - Kris Allen after winning American Idol

"Adam was just too edgy for mainstream America" -Simon Nasser, marketing director of Warner Music

--------------------------------------------------

This is unjust, and America got it WRONG.

Let's set aside the fact that I am a long-time Adam fan...and let me tell explain why this year's Idol results have left me so dissatisfied.

For anyone who has followed this year's competition, Adam's genius has been undeniable. Week after week, the man has truly proved himself as a wildly talented and creative artist, setting himself up as the judge's obvious favorite. (A standing ovation from Simon? Are you kidding me?)

So what went wrong? How did he come in behind Kris Allen, the 'little contestant that could' as one blogger called him? Here is my theory (one I've found all across the blogosphere today...)

From the beginning, Adam was a bold character--outrageous fashion, black nail polish, and eyeliner. His 'questionability' escalated when 'gay-kiss' photos that surfaced early in the Idol season, and probably contributed to his second-place finish.

I personally have heard many Christian/conservatives around me bring up his ambiguous sexuality--labelling him as 'gay' and shaking their heads/shrugging their shoulders as if that was the end of the matter. I confronted one of my friends, in a conversation that went about like this:
Friend: "I'm voting for Kris"
Me: "I think Adam is way better."
Friend: "Yeah, but he's gay."
Me: ...blinks, wondering if Friend realizes what an illogical statement that was... "This is a SINGING competition..."
Friend: "Yeah, I was just sayin'..."
Me: "Okay. That makes sense. As long as you follow every mention of Kris with the statement, 'he's straight.' Or we could just concede that sexuality has nothing to do with an individual's artistic merit..."
Friend: ...gives me a look...

It's this kind of unconcious, unfair leap that gets me so infuriated. As a Christian, I can appreciate that many of my conservative friends do not feel like they can approve of homosexuality (Adam has never confirmed he is gay, in fact.) But translating Romans 1 into the a wholesale rejection of any person who may be a gay/lesbian, regardless of context--this offends my logical mind as well as my conscience.

I found it very maddening that so many Christians seemed to feel morally obligated to support Danny Gokey or Kris Allen--both clean-cut, wholesome, former worship leaders. (I concede that both men were talented, especially Danny, in my opinion). When Danny disappeared the week before the finale, I was not surprised to see my Danny-fan-friends flocking to Kris. Performance and talent were, admittedly, second in importance to them--they took comfort in the warm-fuzzy videos of Kris' Arkansas family and his cute, blonde wife. With Kris, everything was just...so...NICE.

As one blogger put it,

Maybe it was foolish of me to think that a copiously mascara'd,
leather-sheathed, rock-operatic free spirit from Southern California could
actually beat out a clean-cut, happily married church worship leader from
Arkansas who kind of looks like Joey from Friends



Simply put, I think that America wasn't ready for a (potentially) gay American Idol. There is no other explanation in my (perhaps biased) mind for why the wildly acclaimed, thorougly original, incredibly gifted Adam Lambert was forced to forgo the title of 'Idol'. I believe his loss was, at least in large part, due to the unfortunate but all-too-common phenomenon of Religion-Applied-Wrongly-In-An-Irrelevant-Context.

Ah, I've cooled off a bit today. I really wasn't a very faithful viewer of Idol, but the injustice of last night's results got me riled up nonetheless. (Blogpost titles like "America gets it Wrong", "Intolerance Wins Out" and "Adam Robbed" show I'm not alone in these sentiments)

I'm not worried about Adam, though. He's a musical gem, and, to use a Biblical reference for good measure, "he will appear before kings, he will not stand before ordinary men." (Prov 22:29)

I restmy case. But if you haven't had theopportunity to hear the musical mastery that is Adam Lambert, look up "MadWorld" or "Feeling Good"or "One"...or whatever. And enjoy.


Saturday, May 9, 2009

Hannity, Ingraham Poupon Obama's Burger Choice

Tensions in the Middle East, economic uncertainty, and a brand new budget apparently don't cut it as "news" for Fox.

President Obama and Vice President Biden's recent stop at Ray's Hell Burgers in Arlington proved to be just the presidential dirt that the news syndicate was looking for. Sean Hannity said it best- "Now take a look at him ordering his burger with a very special condiment..."



Alright, I'm going to have just a basic cheddar cheeseburger; medium-well; uh, I just want mustard, no ketchup. Do you have a spicy mustard, something like that, or a dijon mustard, something like that?

Dijon, you say? Apparently Dijon mustard is now the hallmark of the rich elite and indicative of an overindulgence in television. What most surprises me is that Hannity can pull off this incredulous comment with a straight face. In his defense, his condemnation of Obama's "fancy burger" pales in comparision to the roasting that conservative talk show host Laura Ingraham gave him:

I don't even like the way the man orders a hamburger! What kind of man orders a cheeseburger without ketchup, but dijon mustard? See, he was trying to do this whole thing with Biden- 'we're like the regular people; we're like every other guy you know with our, our with on our lunch break we're going to go grab a burger- two guys, two bros....

Here a male voice in the background interrupts with "and the bottle of water, what?" Note to self: apparently bottled wated is also taboo now. That's going to cramp my hiking plans...

The guy orders a cheeseburger without ketchup!? What is that? I'm watching this I think: 'okay, the press corps is so easily bought off, you just buy them a couple of dirty old burgers, they're fine'...Do these men not have anything better to do than go on a roadtrip to Arlington (which is a 2.7 mile, 8 minute drive from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW to Ray's Hell Burgers, according to Google maps) for a photo-op which is done for one reason and one reason only. You know why it's done?

Ingraham went on to mock an interview with a woman who claimed the lunch stop made Obama seem "in touch with people". She then quipped that it would have been more appropriate for the president to go through the drive through asking for Grey Poupon (in reference to a 1980s commercial for the condiment), and extended her criticism to Obama's "hesitation" in ordering, choosing a church, buying a puppy, and answering a question about the genesis of life.

No ketchup!? Henry John Heinz would be rolling in his grave, or something like that...

Besides not being able to fathom how anyone can argue this position, I can't help but feel that Ms Ingraham will not be a welcome customer at Ray's after her reference to his "dirty old burgers." And if she or Hannity think they're doing Republicans any favors by satirizing themselves, then someone needs to get out the muzzles soon.

So next time you're in the mustard aisle of your local grocery store, reflect on how your choice of condiments will label you as either a patriotic American or an elitist snob. The choice is yours.

With all of the crises the administration is dealing with right now, Obama must feel good knowing that he need not fear the paper arrows flying at him from the right.

Check out the article at http://leisureblogs.chicagotribune.com/thestew/2009/05/mustard-museum-dont-poupon-obamas-mustard-choice.html
Allô, my poisonous friend.
Hey Walter.